Dyson

What I like about Dyson is that he is not down talking religion like many other scientist he is actually mentioning that religion and science cannot always fight with each other because they are actually compatible with one another. I can see why he thinks this way, because after all, is not science mostly theoretical? Meaning that a lot of these ideas are THEORIES.

I know there is a difference between a hypothesis and a theory but never the less they are still forms of assumptions. Having assumptions present create a leeway for some facts to be questionable and not actually plain evidently true. A lot of these deductions are made by mathematical computations, what if they are not all accurate? So in a way religion and science lie on the same plane that they both have their side of the story that is not seen clearly by the public or understood yet